In partnership with
The New Rules of Online Visibility
Your customers are searching in places your strategy doesn’t reach.
So before your business is buried and left behind, you need to understand the new rules of SEO.
BELAY's SEO in the Age of AI report explains how search is changing, what AI means for your visibility, and the practical steps small businesses like yours can take to stay visible.
BELAY’s U.S.-based Marketing Assistants turn strategy into execution, helping your business stay visible, credible, and competitive in every search.
What education needs to teach in an AI economy
A student can now ask an AI system for an essay, code, translation, explanation, or research outline within seconds. Schools still often reward students for producing exactly those outputs.
That gap is becoming harder to ignore.
The International Labour Organization reported in 2025 that one in four workers worldwide holds a job with some exposure to generative AI. Most exposed jobs are expected to change rather than disappear completely.
For developing economies, the problem has another layer. Education systems must prepare huge young populations while fixing existing learning gaps.
India, Bangladesh and Nigeria show three versions of this problem. Their circumstances differ greatly. Yet each must answer the same question.
What should a student learn when machines can already perform part of the intellectual work?
The first problem comes before AI
Teaching AI means little if students struggle with reading and mathematics.
The World Bank estimates that 70 percent of ten-year-olds across low and middle-income countries cannot understand a simple written text. That learning gap existed before generative AI reached classrooms.
Bangladesh offers a useful example.
The 2025 Bangladesh Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey found that 50.2 percent of children aged 7 to 14 had foundational reading skills. Only 39.2 percent had foundational numeracy skills.
The same survey found internet access in 72.1 percent of households. Yet access alone doesn't mean people possess useful digital skills. Among women aged 15 to 24, 37.6 percent had at least one ICT skill.
This changes how education reform should be framed.
Countries need stronger literacy and mathematics alongside AI literacy. One cannot compensate for weakness in the other.
A student who cannot evaluate an argument will struggle with AI output. A student weak in mathematics may accept a confident calculation without checking it.
AI makes foundational knowledge more valuable because verification becomes part of learning.
Education has to move beyond remembering answers
For decades, examination systems rewarded memory because information was difficult to obtain.
That condition has changed.
Students can retrieve facts almost instantly. AI can also reorganize those facts into essays, presentations and explanations.
Assessment therefore needs to test what happens after information arrives.
Can the student judge whether an answer is accurate?
Can they compare conflicting evidence?
Can they explain why an AI response is weak?
Can they solve a problem using incomplete information?
Can they defend their reasoning without outsourcing it?
These abilities are harder to automate than routine recall.
UNESCO's AI competency framework reflects this broader approach. It covers human-centred thinking, AI ethics, AI techniques, applications and AI system design. The framework moves students through understanding, application and creation.
That suggests AI education should extend beyond prompt writing.
Students need to understand data, probability, bias and verification. They also need privacy awareness and basic computational thinking.
India is already changing the curriculum
India has moved further than many developing economies in formal AI education.
In October 2025, India's Ministry of Education announced plans to introduce Artificial Intelligence and Computational Thinking from Grade 3. The rollout began with the 2026 to 2027 academic session.
CBSE has also developed a Computational Thinking and AI framework for Classes III to VIII. AI already appears among skill subjects at secondary and senior secondary levels.
The harder work comes after curriculum design.
Teachers must understand what they are teaching. Schools need devices, connectivity and suitable materials. Assessment must also change with classroom practice.
Otherwise, AI becomes another textbook chapter students memorize for examinations.
India's scale makes this especially difficult. A policy can move quickly from Delhi. Classroom capacity moves at another speed.
Bangladesh has policy movement but a wider classroom gap
Bangladesh released its National Artificial Intelligence Policy 2026 to 2030 in draft form during 2026.
The government has proposed bringing AI education into secondary, higher and technical education. The policy process also connects AI skills with future employment and public-sector use.
Yet curriculum reform cannot start with AI alone.
Bangladesh still has large gaps in foundational learning. Upper-secondary completion also remains low. UNICEF's 2025 data puts that completion rate at 43.9 percent.
There is, however, infrastructure that can support teacher development.
UNESCO reported in 2025 that Bangladesh's Teachers Portal had more than 600,000 registered educators. Teachers use it for digital content, peer learning and professional development.
That existing network matters.
Bangladesh doesn't need every teacher to become an AI engineer. Teachers need enough AI literacy to guide students and check machine-generated work.
They also need methods for teaching reasoning with limited technology.
A village classroom shouldn't become academically weaker because broadband is poor.
Nigeria shows why technology must fit local constraints
Nigeria faces similar questions with different infrastructure pressures.
Its revised nine-year Basic Education Curriculum uses a competency and outcome-based model. It includes ICT skills, information literacy, critical thinking, research and problem-solving among its core competencies.
The country's National EdTech Strategy for 2025 to 2030 also links teacher capacity, infrastructure, education data and safe AI use.
This matters because AI education designed around constant broadband will exclude many students.
Nigeria's emerging teacher programmes are already experimenting with offline-first approaches. The UNESCO SDG 4 Knowledge Hub describes one national initiative built around mobile and offline access.
That design principle applies far beyond Nigeria.
Developing countries shouldn't copy education technology models from wealthy urban school systems. Their systems must work on cheaper phones, slower networks and local languages.
Own The Hallway This Year
Forget basic. The latest Sprayground collection brings together premium craftsmanship, bold artwork, and statement-making style in backpacks built for every school day. Whether you're walking the halls or heading across campus, carry something that stands out from the crowd.
Teachers become more important, but their job changes
AI can prepare exercises, summarize material and generate explanations.
That doesn't remove the teacher.
It changes where teacher time has the highest value.
Teachers will spend less value producing routine information. More value moves toward diagnosis, feedback and human judgment.
They need to identify whether students actually understand something. They need to spot copied reasoning disguised as original work.
Teacher training therefore has to change before student assessment changes fully.
Giving students AI while teachers lack AI literacy creates an obvious imbalance.
It also pushes schools toward bans.
A better approach teaches teachers how AI fails, where it helps, and how students should verify its output.
Examinations may need the deepest redesign
Homework has already changed.
An essay written outside school can no longer prove authorship reliably. Neither can a programming assignment completed without observation.
Education systems will need different evidence of learning.
More assessment may happen through oral explanation and supervised problem-solving. Students can also be asked to critique AI-generated answers.
Project work can include records showing how decisions were made.
Some examinations will still need closed environments. Others can permit AI and test how well students use it.
The important distinction is what the examination intends to measure.
If memory is the target, AI should remain outside.
If judgment is the target, controlled AI use may reveal more.
AI education cannot become another inequality machine
The World Bank's 2025 Digital Progress and Trends report shows how uneven AI capacity remains.
High-income countries hosted 77 percent of global co-location data-centre capacity by June 2025. Lower-middle-income countries held only 5 percent.
Internet use also differs sharply by income group. The World Bank reports 93 percent usage in high-income countries and 54 percent in lower-middle-income economies.
Education reform has to assume unequal access from the beginning.
Students shouldn't need expensive AI subscriptions to complete normal schoolwork.
Public education systems need shared infrastructure, low-bandwidth tools and local-language resources. Schools also need rules covering student data and privacy.
Otherwise, better-connected children will learn how to work with AI. Everyone else will learn about AI from a textbook.
That would reproduce an old education gap using newer technology.
Universities need a different relationship with employment
The university problem is slightly different.
Degrees often take several years to redesign. AI capabilities can change materially within months.
That makes rigid course structures increasingly difficult to defend.
Computer science students need more than coding syntax. Business students need experience working with automated analysis.
Journalism students need verification methods for synthetic media. Engineering students need simulation, data and AI-assisted design skills.
Humanities students need evidence checking and machine-assisted research methods.
Vocational education also deserves more attention.
AI will affect technicians, office workers and service occupations alongside university graduates. Education reform cannot remain an elite university project.
The World Bank reported that generative-AI vacancies increased ninefold between 2021 and 2024. One fifth were already located in middle-income economies.
The opportunity exists. Education systems determine how widely people can participate.
The subject called AI isn't enough
A country can add an AI chapter without changing education.
The harder reform touches mathematics, language, science, assessment and teacher preparation. It also changes what schools consider evidence of understanding.
India has started moving AI toward younger students. Bangladesh has begun connecting AI policy with education and workforce planning. Nigeria is rebuilding parts of its curriculum around competencies and digital learning.
None has finished the work.
The real test will appear inside ordinary classrooms.
A student should leave school knowing how to think without AI. That same student should also know how to think better with it.
This newsletter cannot solve an education system. It can keep the important questions in view as those systems change. The useful work happens between issues, inside classrooms, homes, offices and policy decisions. Following the evidence over time is what makes those decisions better.
Your Boss Will Think You’re an Ecom Genius
Optimizing for growth? Go-to-Millions is Ari Murray’s ecommerce newsletter packed with proven tactics, creative that converts, and real operator insights—from product strategy to paid media. No mushy strategy. Just what’s working. Subscribe free for weekly ideas that drive revenue.
